Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 12:15 pm
The post On LawNext Podcast: A Closer Look At Smokeball, With Chief Revenue Officer Jane Oxley And President Ruchie Chadha appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
9 May 2006, 5:10 am
[JURIST] An increasing number of small businesses are going private in order to avoid disproportionately higher costs of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act [PDF text], according to a new report [PDF text] from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) [official website]. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:41 pm
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes Oxley) is a federal law that provides protection to those who work for publicly traded companies and who inform authorities about SEC regulation violations or federal law violations connected to fraud against corporate shareholders. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:12 pm
The law firm Baker Hostetler is slated to announce tomorrow that former representative Michael Oxley will join the firm’s Washington, D.C., office, effective March 12, in an of-counsel position. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:16 am
It remains one of the most consequential governance developments in history and serves as an important lesson for corporate officers, directors and their professional advisors. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 9:16 pm
Robert Brown posts here on his blog called The Race to The Bottom about the restriction in Section 402 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act on loans by a company to its officers, compared with the generally deferential review under Delaware's business... [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 8:56 am
Appropriately, then, it was in Chicago last week, during ABA TECHSHOW, that host Bob Ambrogi sat down for a face-to-face conversation with two of Smokeball’s top executives, Jane Oxley, chief revenue officer for Smokeball internationally, and Ruchie Chadha, president of Smokeball in the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Whistleblower Protection under Sarbanes-Oxley Sarbanes-Oxley protects certain employees who blow the whistle on publicly held companies. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Lawson are protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Supreme Court focused on the relevant language of the anti-retaliation provision, which prohibits any publicly traded company or any “officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company” from retaliating against an employee who provides information or otherwise assists in certain investigations into possible violations of the Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
I'm not sure how the patent office will deal with it. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:39 am
The post Whistleblower Protection Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act appeared first on Dallas Employment Lawyer Blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
Director workload and risk increased: audit committees meet more than twice as often post SOX as they did pre SOX, and Director and Officer (D&O) insurance premiums more than doubled. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Attorney’s Office. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:25 am
Dec. 11, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
The plaintiff in the case, Andrea Gail Jones, was the former chief financial officer of SouthPeak, a video game manufacturer. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:00 pm
SOX gives litigators the benefit of 20/20 hindsight to identify minor or technical reporting mistakes as the basis for lawsuits against corporations, officers, and directors. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
The federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) was enacted in response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems, and WorldCom. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
Five years ago today, Congress adopted the legislation commonly known as Sarbanes-Oxley or SOX. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:59 pm
Bainbridge, Stephen Mark, Sarbanes-Oxley § 404 at Twenty (August 26, 2022). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
Iqbal, noted in our May 27, 2010 posting, to a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower claim. [read post]
